DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TAL
Docket No: 6081-13
18 June 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
“Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval. record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies,
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
11 February 1993. You received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for
failure to obey a lawful regulation. In your last enlisted
evaluation report for the period of 16 December 1996 through 10
June 1998, which submitted on the occasion of you separation
from active duty, you were removed from training status due to
disciplinary reasons. On 10 June 1998, you were honorably
released from active duty and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended
for retention) reenlistment code. On 14 December 2000, you were
honorably discharged from the Navy Reserve and not recommended
for reenlistment.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth, overall record of service, and desire to change your
reenlistment code for possible reentry into the armed forces.
Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given.
the non-recommendation for reenlistment which was sufficient to
support the assignment of an RE-4. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of. the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official
_haval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
SES Fy
ROBERT D. AZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5317 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-4 reentry code in light of your misconduct, personality disorder, and non-recommendation for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4380 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. You were then notified that you were being administratively separated due to: erroneous enlistment (drug abuse). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01736-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary ; material considered by thé Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6745 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06704-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2011. Your record contains an adverse performance evaluation for the period from 8 June 1993 to 30 June 1994 which reflects, in part, that you were not recommended for advancement or retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5410 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,-your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability would normally be assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08000-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 November 2005 an ADB recommended discharge under honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to alcohol rehabilitation failure. On 2 February 2006 you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09610-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5643 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5884 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. On 19 November 1991, you received the honorable discharge by reason of your diagnosed personality disorder and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.